Profiling the English Terrorist- Red Flags


In the aftermath of the Manchester Arena bombing  it’s hard to understand what drives someone to the point that they believe their only option is suicide  while killing and maiming innocent people.

Let us at least make the attempt.

Push factors that influence  radicalization and mobilization pathways and help shape an “extremist mindset” include socio-economic background, psychological characteristics,  physical venues,  key concepts from Islam and Muslim history and attitudes towards Western ways and policies

Even though there is no single cause or pathway into radicalisation and violent extremism,

Salman Abedi, the manchester bomber,  shares several features with other homegrown European Islamic terrorists.

Most were

Risultati immagini per checklist ticksaged in their 20s.

Young adults are more prone to risk taking and late adolescence/young adulthood is associated, to some degree, with political alienation and with approval of disruptive forms of political behaviour.

In other words, the violent impulse exists and they seek an ideology to rationalise it.

Younger adults may display greater openness to extreme political attitudes—and perhaps to extremist behaviour .

Disillusioned, frustrated, angry (and mainly male) youth adopt existing ideologies relevant to them and then search for the parts that can be twisted to justify their violence.

Risultati immagini per checklist tickswere unemployed or students and

Risultati immagini per checklist tickshad an immigrant background which can lead to  a sense of geographic dislocation, cultural gaps between generations and complex identity issues resulting in a sense of alienation.

They feel they neither belong to  England or the parents’ original society. According to one friend of Abedi’s family most of the Libyan youth in Manchester felt “disbanded” and did not know where they belonged.

“They don’t belong to either society. They are neither Libyan nor British. They are not accepted anywhere. And Libyan society considers them half-breeds. They are not accepted, which leads to so much frustration and discontent.” 

Risultati immagini per red flags

What do we know about Salman Abedi?
His father, Ramadan, arrived in the UK in  1993, as a refugee from Ghedaffi’s Libya . Salman was born in Manchester in 1994 and raised there

Risultati immagini per red flags

NB: 1) the majority of European jihadis come from first and second generation Muslims who were born in Europe.
2) Greater Manchester is one of the 4 UK regions that have produced most of the UK’s jihadis over time . It has a large Muslim population.

How did Salman fit into English society?

At school (Burnage Academy for Boys  2009 -2011), he  smoked marijuana and drank vodka,  He loved football but was aggressive and had “anger issues”. He mixed with gangs in south Manchester.

May 2016 Along with other young men of Libyan descent in Manchester, he was enraged by the gang killing  of a friend  who died after being run down by a car and then stabbed. Abedi viewed the attack as a hate crime and grew increasingly angry about what he considered ill-treatment of Muslims in Britain.

Risultati immagini per red flags

NB A young man is more likely to radicalise if he   views his life through a prism of discrimination/ deprivation and   sees particular events as requiring a direct and personal response. Mr Ramadan Abedi said he feared his son was becoming increasingly drawn into drugs and criminality after the death of  his friend.

Risultati immagini per red flags
NB:1) Many European Jihadists also have a criminal past, such as involvement in minor gang crime, which can be preyed on by recruiters presenting a “redemption narrative

2) One of the personal triggers that pushes an individual to violent action is belief that there is a need to join insurgent groups to avenge for the death of their associates.

3) Another is that it is their religious duty to embark on warfare to defeat the enemies of their religion.

What did Salman do next?

He started  Salford University in 2014 where he studied business management for 2 years before dropping out.
He did not live in university accommodation, had not been in any trouble at the university and was not on any radar for pastoral or social care. He did not participate in any clubs or societies and never met with the resident imam.

Risultati immagini per red flags
NB: Current and previous UK government warns universities that lonely Muslim students are potentially at risk of radicalisation
Salman Abedi had been a “regular kid”, who went out and drank until around a year ago when he “dropped off the radar”, becoming more and more devout and withdrawn

Risultati immagini per red flags
NB self-isolation is another red flag as radicals have a loose or no connection with Muslim communties

Could emotional and/or experiential factors have influenced Salman’s decision to support  political violence?

If he was searching for purpose and belonging, membership might well have been seen as a route to action, adventure, power and the sense of brotherhood.

Abedi’s younger sister, Jomana, said she thought he was driven by what he saw as injustices.

 ‘I think he saw children—Muslim children—dying everywhere, and wanted revenge.

He saw the explosives America drops on children in Syria, and he wanted revenge”.

Risultati immagini per red flags

NB: 1) the main motivation of young men for joining jihad seems to be fascination with the narrative:

the small brotherhood of super-heroes who avenge the Muslim Ummah”;

This reinforces religious solidarity with Muslims around the world

2) experiences of discrimination and social segregation are causes of radicalisation amongst the educated  middle-class. 

“Perceived discrimination toward Muslims living in the West is significantly associated with justifying  suicide bombing. A direct and immediate confrontation with the insulting perpetrator may or may not occur at the time of the bad experience, but the target of explicit discrimination may feel an especially stinging personal humiliation, more salient inter-group antagonism, and perhaps generalization of intergroup conflict behaviors—which may then extend to individual or collective support for anti-Western extremist behaviours”

What about his home background?

Family connections in Manchester included Gaddafi dissidents who had been members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group, which was linked to Al Qaeda.

Could the Internet have played a role?

Choosing to access jihadist websites may be, at least to some extent, an activity of persons already inclined toward anti-Western sentiment, such that viewing this media may more often confirm preconceptions or exacerbate tendencies than change minds

What about a desire to be (in)famous?

Geting on world news and TV  transforms an ordinary bloke into a  name. It  is an express train to fame, unpredictably turning nobodies into somebodies.

Salman Abedi may have wanted to be somebody.

Did no one notice the red flags?

Salman Abedi was flagged to authorities five times over his extremist views, raising questions as to why he was never stopped by officers.

Home Secretary Amber Rudd  disclosed that Abedi was known to British intelligence prior to the attack, but did not make clear why no action was taken.


We do not know what exactly triggers jihadism in any individual.We may surmise that

real-world interactions play a highly significant role in the process of someone moving from merely supporting extremism to becoming a terrorist.

But we do know Salman Abedi’s path was not unique. We know 16 convicted or dead terrorists lived within 2.5 miles of each other in south Manchester

What clearly emerges is that something’s going wrong with the process of integration, assimilation, multi-culturalism and mutual respect in the minds of some English-born sons of Muslim immigrants

 Risultati immagini per red flags

Refs and Pics

Click to access 0fcfd509011c8bed2b000000.pdf

Click to access issue_paper_root-causes_jan2016_en.pdf

4 thoughts on “Profiling the English Terrorist- Red Flags

  1. It’s the spooks that ‘motivate’ these individuals. Just like in Ireland the British state managed to publically distance themselves from the “terrorists” allthewhile unbeknownst to most of the public the state was actually directing and controlling terrorism. Whose to say they aren’t doing the exact same tactic in their own country? Do folk think they wouldn’t stoop so low in the dirty tricks dept? Well some folk are so naïve I suppose.


    • No problem benmadigan. Alas most folk are reluctant to question the false flag issue for fear of being mocked and ridiculed etc. However we in Ireland have ample instances whereby great suspicion is directed at the British state concerning their involvement in terror attacks in Ireland. Alas the Brit state has contrived to bend its way out of many corners when confronted with evidence by claiming its rogue cops or ex soldiers etc. Just recently we had former members of MRF/FRU claim they were tasked with carrying out terror attacks in Ireland and that if they were exposed/apprehended by state forces(ordinary peelers not in on the plot) the state would deny they were members of the security forces I.e it would be claimed they had left the army before they took up their new terror roles. This was to protect ‘national security’. In layman terms this was to preserve the illusion that the Brit state was a peacekeeper and respected the law.
      Most republicans with an ounce of wit know well the states denials of involvement in terrorism is horseshite and that’s because republicans know the Brit state up close and personal. Most members of the public however derive their perception of the state(police etc) from t.v interviews etc(p.r shows) and thus they only think they know how the state behaves.
      A friend of mine recently told me that a lot of his mates and others often would remark, say when an innocent taig was shot by unionists, “he mustn’t have got it for nothing”. I.e these people from a nationalist background would accept a unionist terror admission that they killed an IRA man(ordinary taig). Even nationalists, back in the day, refused to contemplate what republicans claimed was collusion over the years and often dismissed it as sour grapes or conspiracy theory stuff. Alas my friend learnt the hard way that some taigs did get shot for NOT being in the IRA etc when two of his work colleagues were shot dead by unionist terrorists.
      Anyway I veered off the subject there. Back to British intelligence terrorism. Does anyone believe these powerful bodies wouldn’t carry out black ops, false flags or whatever on their own soil/people in order to push an agenda? Especially an agenda that protects the British state interests (please note that doesn’t mean the British public but rather those who rule the British public). Looking back at our experiences here in Ireland I would categorically state that there is nothing they wouldn’t rule out doing. In fact I would argue it would be a piece of pxxx for them to perpetrate similar deeds on British soil that they perfected and have great experience of doing in Ireland.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.